A Clearer Look at the Competing House and Senate Tax Proposals
Several tax areas are at the center of the debate. These include:
Bonus depreciation (writing off 100% of qualified assets immediately)
R&D expensing
Interest deduction rules
Why it matters: Making these permanent would give businesses more certainty for long-term planning and investments.
Senate: Keeps the $10,000 cap in place, no income-based phaseout
House: Raises the cap to $40,000, but limits it for high earners
Why it matters: High-income taxpayers in high-tax states would see very different results depending on which version prevails.
Senate: Keeps the 20% deduction and makes it permanent
House: Temporarily increases the deduction to 23%
Why it matters: The Senate’s version offers more consistency; the House version gives a short-term bump.
Both bills look to scale back incentives created by the Inflation Reduction Act—but the Senate's version would phase them out more gradually and on different timelines.
Makes TCJA-era tax brackets and standard deductions permanent
Adds new above-the-line deductions for tips and overtime pay
Locks in limits on business losses used to offset personal income
Increases the exemption amount to $15 million (adjusted for inflation) and makes it permanent
Aligned with the House version here
Adds a 0.5% income threshold for individuals to deduct charitable giving
Keeps the 1% floor for corporations
Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS): More generous gain exclusions and higher thresholds for qualification
Opportunity Zones: Overhaul and extension, with new benefits for rural investments
Employee Retention Credit (ERTC): Tightens enforcement and expands audit timelines
Disaster Relief: Expands eligibility for casualty loss deductions
Nonprofits & Higher Ed: Higher taxes on large university endowments and expanded excise taxes on compensation
Interestingly, both versions avoid:
Raising corporate tax rates
Adjusting capital gains or carried interest rules
Changing the individual tax rates for top earners
Negotiations between the House and Senate will be critical. If they can’t reach a consensus, the entire package could stall—especially with a projected $2.4 trillion cost attached to the House version. The Senate version has not yet been scored.
While no version is final, the shape of the legislation gives a good preview of where tax policy could be heading—especially for business owners, high-income earners, and those planning for major life events like a liquidity event or generational wealth transfer.
If you have questions about how this could impact your financial or tax strategy, now is the time to start planning.